From margaret.worley at plu.edu Thu Feb 1 08:17:26 2001 From: margaret.worley at plu.edu (Margaret Worley) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement Message-ID: <3A798C16.6382E9CE@plu.edu> Questions: Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? If so, what circumstances led you to use it? Have you received any software grants because of it? Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit from it? Thanks in advance for responses Margaret -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 Pacific Lutheran University Tacoma, WA 98447 Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or that of another person) in an e-mail message. From mextine at stmartin.edu Thu Feb 1 10:12:34 2001 From: mextine at stmartin.edu (Extine, Michael W.) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement Message-ID: Saint Martin's College has been participating for two years. We are a smaller campus than most of you so it was perhaps we chose to participate for somewhat different reasons. Advantage #1: When upgrading or reinstalling software on a staff or faculty PC we would previously need to be aware of existing licenses for Windows and Office. Sometimes we would need to install older versions of either product or entice/encourage/threaten the user to pay for upgrades. Now, we are confident that we can reinstall whichever version of Windows and Office we currently prefer. Advantage #2: Planning and budgeting for Windows/Office upgrades is simplified -- at least as far as the budgets for software. We currently visit the departments and extort (er. extract) $45 per FTE each year. Advantage #3: If you consider one PC per staff/faculty, the costs are somewhat lower than before. Although Microsoft considers it a great savings, I am not quite so sure. IF there is a major O/S every two years and IF there is an Office release every two years and IF we always want to upgrade every system on campus then we are spending on average $40-50 per PC per year. The campus agreement is in the same range. HOWEVER: The Campus Agreement licenses PC's but is priced per staff/faculty FTE (including part-timers at a reduced rate) so can potentially include many more PC's than the number of staff/faculty. The agreement covers PC's in computer labs, library, classrooms, etc. so this is potentially a great savings! Assume that you have 2 staff to manage 100 PC's in various classrooms. You pay Microsoft per staff, not per PC! That means paying around $100 per year lets you upgrade the software on 100 PC's. The license also includes Visual Studio so that can also be a major benefit. Downside: You are pretty much hooked (needle in the arm, etc.) as it's pretty difficult to back out of the agreement. I think you're required to return to prior versions of windows, remove Office totally (or downgrade to existing licenses). I'm really happy we are participating! Mike -----Original Message----- From: Margaret Worley [mailto:margaret.worley@plu.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:31 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement Questions: Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? If so, what circumstances led you to use it? Have you received any software grants because of it? Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit from it? Thanks in advance for responses Margaret -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 Pacific Lutheran University Tacoma, WA 98447 Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or that of another person) in an e-mail message. From rellis at ups.edu Thu Feb 1 10:12:05 2001 From: rellis at ups.edu (Raney Ellis) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement References: <3A798C16.6382E9CE@plu.edu> Message-ID: <3A79A6F5.7A21782F@ups.edu> Margaret, UPS is currently in the MS Campus Agreement contract for the second year. We decided to use it because it gave us access at a relatively low cost per year to a set of campus-standard software without needing to track numbers of licenses. It also permits use of the software by faculty and staff on their home computers. I don't believe we have received any software grants specifically because of participation in the Agreement. By the way, I am no longer with the University of Puget Sound. Don't know yet what the future holds, but I do expect to stay in Tacoma. My email address is now: rellis@harbornet.com but the UPS address will also work for a few months. I do want to keep in touch with the many friends I have made in NW-HEAT and in NWACC. Raney Ellis Margaret Worley wrote: > Questions: > > Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? > > If so, what circumstances led you to use it? > > Have you received any software grants because of it? > > Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit > from it? > > Thanks in advance for responses > Margaret > -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 > Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu > Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 > Pacific Lutheran University > Tacoma, WA 98447 > > Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or > that of another person) in an e-mail message. From BKirk at warnerpacific.edu Thu Feb 1 11:35:23 2001 From: BKirk at warnerpacific.edu (Bill Kirk) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Mailing systems Message-ID: <814110E5ACC0D211BACF00105A04432FDB9055@SHASTA> > Greetings, > > We are currently looking at a variety of mail system components , such as > a CASS/PAVE certifying software package, envelope/mail flat printer, > postage meter, folder, taber, etc... We have been leasing Smart Mailer > software, W700 printer, and a postage meter from Pitney Bowes. As the > lease is about to end, we are looking to see if this is the best choice or > what our other options might be . > > If you deal with this type of equipment, what type of equipment do you > use (particularly the software, printer, and meter)? Have you had any > particularly good or bad experiences with pieces of equipment, brands > (particularly Pitney Bowes, ASCom, Neopost) or vendors in this field? Do > you use a full featured product (such as Pitney Bowes Documatch) that > includes features such as document printing, folding, stuffing, tabbing, > addressing, envelope sealing to produce a finished product? If so, how did > it work out for you? > > Thanx for any information... > > Jim Dorris > Warner Pacific College > > From irvw at linfield.edu Thu Feb 1 15:20:54 2001 From: irvw at linfield.edu (Irv Wiswall) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement In-Reply-To: <3A798C16.6382E9CE@plu.edu> Message-ID: <1298009.3190029654@[10.171.255.53]> Margaret, We are considering participation. We've reviewed the college's past 3 year's expenditures purchasing Microsoft products through OETC. This suggests that, if past trends continue, we would experience slightly lower costs. In the past, costs were incurred by departmental budgets, not a central one. We are considering two potential advantages: Reduced administrative overhead as we won't have to keep track of who purchases what, nor will we need to engage in the whole process necessary to charge departmental budgets. Remove monetary impediment to upgrading. OETC pricing for Office is only around $40, but that sometimes stops people. We see this mainly in terms of being able to keep work groups homogenous. -Irv --On Thursday, February 1, 2001 9:30 AM -0800 Margaret Worley wrote: > Questions: > > Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? > > If so, what circumstances led you to use it? > > Have you received any software grants because of it? > > Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit > from it? > > Thanks in advance for responses > Margaret > -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 > Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu > Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 > Pacific Lutheran University > Tacoma, WA 98447 > > Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or > that of another person) in an e-mail message. From irvw at linfield.edu Mon Feb 5 10:09:26 2001 From: irvw at linfield.edu (Irv Wiswall) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: SCUP Satellite Telecast w/PBS on March 15 Message-ID: <494999.3190356566@[10.171.255.53]> Folks, SCUP is doing a teleconference on technology planning in higher ed for VP types on March 15. Linfield may want to participate, but we don't have downlink capability. (anyone missing the irony is in serious need of irony supplements) Anyone participating that wouldn't mind some guests and help paying subscription fees? -Irv From GSHEARER at seattleu.edu Mon Feb 5 11:14:25 2001 From: GSHEARER at seattleu.edu (Shearer, George) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: SCUP Satellite Telecast w/PBS on March 15 Message-ID: <2CB090FC30192549B04101547F33E93F01DC7403@exegrnnts005.seattleu.edu> Irv, Seattle University would be happy to help in some manner. We would need more details about cost but I am sure we could record the presentation and make it available for others to view. If it works best to commit to be a receive site, then we could check availability on one of our conference rooms. George Shearer Director-Instructional Support Information Technology Seattle University 900 Broadway Seattle WA 98122 206-296-5592 > ---------- > From: Irv Wiswall > Reply To: nw-heat@nw-heat.org > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2001 11:00 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: SCUP Satellite Telecast w/PBS on March 15 > > Folks, SCUP is doing a teleconference on technology planning in higher ed > > for VP types on March 15. Linfield may want to participate, but we don't > have downlink capability. (anyone missing the irony is in serious need of > irony supplements) Anyone participating that wouldn't mind some guests and > > help paying subscription fees? > > -Irv > > > From kelly at lclark.edu Tue Feb 6 09:01:21 2001 From: kelly at lclark.edu (kelly@lclark.edu) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: [Fwd: Job at Lewis & Clark College] Message-ID: <146757.3190438881@[149.175.21.181]> A job announcement that some of you might find interesting or know of somebody who might be interested. Kelly ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Date: Monday, February 5, 2001 3:22 PM -0800 From: Kari Chisholm To: Kelly Wainwright Subject: [Fwd: Job at Lewis & Clark College] Howdy all-- Below is a short job posting for a Web Communications Consultant here at Lewis & Clark College. Basically, I'm looking for that rare individual who can think, write, edit, strategize, code, schmooze, and have fun doing it. It's a tall order, but I'm sure the right talent is out there -- someone who wants to do fascinating projects and work at the most beautiful campus in America. -kari. Kari Chisholm, karic@lclark.edu Creative Director for New Media Lewis & Clark College Portland, Oregon USA http://www.lclark.edu ------------------------------ Job Opening: Web Communications Consultant Office of Publications Lewis & Clark College Plans and develops Web communication strategies for departmental clients that lead to effective communications to external audiences. Provides leadership, consultation, and Web development services to academic and administrative departments. Reports to the Creative Director for New Media. Salary is $28,000 - $32,000 / year. Starting date for this full-time, year-round position is immediately. Apply by February 23, 2001. See the complete job posting and application instructions here: http://www.lclark.edu/dept/hr/jobs_staff.html Please distribute this announcement. ---------- End Forwarded Message ---------- Kelly Wainwright Director of Client Services Information Technology Lewis & Clark College From prescott at up.edu Thu Feb 8 14:26:11 2001 From: prescott at up.edu (Jerilyn Prescott) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Copyright, CD Rom Burner and Radio Station Message-ID: <3A831D03.558EC96D@up.edu> The student run radio station at the University of Portland wants a CD-ROM Burner to condense their CD collection. They want to copy selected songs ('the good ones') then archive or throw away the original CD to clear space for new CDs. I have misgivings that is a violation of copyright law. However, I do not know for sure. Does anyone know the answer? Are other university radio stations doing this? Any comments are very much welcome! Thanks, Jerilyn Prescott Project and Service Manager Computer and Telecommunication Services University of Portland 5000 N Willamette Blvd. Portland OR 97203 503.943-7469 prescott@up.edu From mextine at stmartin.edu Fri Feb 9 09:58:53 2001 From: mextine at stmartin.edu (Extine, Michael W.) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: Copyright, CD Rom Burner and Radio Station Message-ID: Here's what our librarian said, " ... It would be funny if it weren't so frightening. I'd direct her to http://loc.gov/copyright. The DCMA has very clear implications here." -----Original Message----- From: Jerilyn Prescott [mailto:prescott@up.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Copyright, CD Rom Burner and Radio Station The student run radio station at the University of Portland wants a CD-ROM Burner to condense their CD collection. They want to copy selected songs ('the good ones') then archive or throw away the original CD to clear space for new CDs. I have misgivings that is a violation of copyright law. However, I do not know for sure. Does anyone know the answer? Are other university radio stations doing this? Any comments are very much welcome! Thanks, Jerilyn Prescott Project and Service Manager Computer and Telecommunication Services University of Portland 5000 N Willamette Blvd. Portland OR 97203 503.943-7469 prescott@up.edu From pitterk at whitman.edu Wed Feb 14 08:27:06 2001 From: pitterk at whitman.edu (Keiko Pitter) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:41 2004 Subject: training opportunities Message-ID: Hi folks I've been seeing several "new" people subscribe to the list recently, welcome! Just so you don't think that there is no activity on this list, I thought I would post "something"...but an important "something"---training opportunities. Most of us in nw-heat also belongs to an organization called NWACC--Northwest Academic Computing Consortium. One of the opportunity provided by NWACC is funding for workshops. If you have an idea for a great workshop (and if you want to coordinate it that's even better) that may be of benefit to folks in the northwest, can you submit a proposal? You can find the information on this at the NWACC Web page...http://www.nwacc.org/conferences/new_guidelines.htm Keiko Pitter Whitman College From margaret.worley at plu.edu Thu Feb 1 08:17:26 2001 From: margaret.worley at plu.edu (Margaret Worley) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement Message-ID: <3A798C16.6382E9CE@plu.edu> Questions: Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? If so, what circumstances led you to use it? Have you received any software grants because of it? Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit from it? Thanks in advance for responses Margaret -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 Pacific Lutheran University Tacoma, WA 98447 Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or that of another person) in an e-mail message. From mextine at stmartin.edu Thu Feb 1 10:12:34 2001 From: mextine at stmartin.edu (Extine, Michael W.) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement Message-ID: Saint Martin's College has been participating for two years. We are a smaller campus than most of you so it was perhaps we chose to participate for somewhat different reasons. Advantage #1: When upgrading or reinstalling software on a staff or faculty PC we would previously need to be aware of existing licenses for Windows and Office. Sometimes we would need to install older versions of either product or entice/encourage/threaten the user to pay for upgrades. Now, we are confident that we can reinstall whichever version of Windows and Office we currently prefer. Advantage #2: Planning and budgeting for Windows/Office upgrades is simplified -- at least as far as the budgets for software. We currently visit the departments and extort (er. extract) $45 per FTE each year. Advantage #3: If you consider one PC per staff/faculty, the costs are somewhat lower than before. Although Microsoft considers it a great savings, I am not quite so sure. IF there is a major O/S every two years and IF there is an Office release every two years and IF we always want to upgrade every system on campus then we are spending on average $40-50 per PC per year. The campus agreement is in the same range. HOWEVER: The Campus Agreement licenses PC's but is priced per staff/faculty FTE (including part-timers at a reduced rate) so can potentially include many more PC's than the number of staff/faculty. The agreement covers PC's in computer labs, library, classrooms, etc. so this is potentially a great savings! Assume that you have 2 staff to manage 100 PC's in various classrooms. You pay Microsoft per staff, not per PC! That means paying around $100 per year lets you upgrade the software on 100 PC's. The license also includes Visual Studio so that can also be a major benefit. Downside: You are pretty much hooked (needle in the arm, etc.) as it's pretty difficult to back out of the agreement. I think you're required to return to prior versions of windows, remove Office totally (or downgrade to existing licenses). I'm really happy we are participating! Mike -----Original Message----- From: Margaret Worley [mailto:margaret.worley@plu.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:31 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement Questions: Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? If so, what circumstances led you to use it? Have you received any software grants because of it? Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit from it? Thanks in advance for responses Margaret -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 Pacific Lutheran University Tacoma, WA 98447 Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or that of another person) in an e-mail message. From rellis at ups.edu Thu Feb 1 10:12:05 2001 From: rellis at ups.edu (Raney Ellis) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement References: <3A798C16.6382E9CE@plu.edu> Message-ID: <3A79A6F5.7A21782F@ups.edu> Margaret, UPS is currently in the MS Campus Agreement contract for the second year. We decided to use it because it gave us access at a relatively low cost per year to a set of campus-standard software without needing to track numbers of licenses. It also permits use of the software by faculty and staff on their home computers. I don't believe we have received any software grants specifically because of participation in the Agreement. By the way, I am no longer with the University of Puget Sound. Don't know yet what the future holds, but I do expect to stay in Tacoma. My email address is now: rellis@harbornet.com but the UPS address will also work for a few months. I do want to keep in touch with the many friends I have made in NW-HEAT and in NWACC. Raney Ellis Margaret Worley wrote: > Questions: > > Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? > > If so, what circumstances led you to use it? > > Have you received any software grants because of it? > > Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit > from it? > > Thanks in advance for responses > Margaret > -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 > Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu > Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 > Pacific Lutheran University > Tacoma, WA 98447 > > Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or > that of another person) in an e-mail message. From BKirk at warnerpacific.edu Thu Feb 1 11:35:23 2001 From: BKirk at warnerpacific.edu (Bill Kirk) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Mailing systems Message-ID: <814110E5ACC0D211BACF00105A04432FDB9055@SHASTA> > Greetings, > > We are currently looking at a variety of mail system components , such as > a CASS/PAVE certifying software package, envelope/mail flat printer, > postage meter, folder, taber, etc... We have been leasing Smart Mailer > software, W700 printer, and a postage meter from Pitney Bowes. As the > lease is about to end, we are looking to see if this is the best choice or > what our other options might be . > > If you deal with this type of equipment, what type of equipment do you > use (particularly the software, printer, and meter)? Have you had any > particularly good or bad experiences with pieces of equipment, brands > (particularly Pitney Bowes, ASCom, Neopost) or vendors in this field? Do > you use a full featured product (such as Pitney Bowes Documatch) that > includes features such as document printing, folding, stuffing, tabbing, > addressing, envelope sealing to produce a finished product? If so, how did > it work out for you? > > Thanx for any information... > > Jim Dorris > Warner Pacific College > > From irvw at linfield.edu Thu Feb 1 15:20:54 2001 From: irvw at linfield.edu (Irv Wiswall) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Microsoft Campus Agreement In-Reply-To: <3A798C16.6382E9CE@plu.edu> Message-ID: <1298009.3190029654@[10.171.255.53]> Margaret, We are considering participation. We've reviewed the college's past 3 year's expenditures purchasing Microsoft products through OETC. This suggests that, if past trends continue, we would experience slightly lower costs. In the past, costs were incurred by departmental budgets, not a central one. We are considering two potential advantages: Reduced administrative overhead as we won't have to keep track of who purchases what, nor will we need to engage in the whole process necessary to charge departmental budgets. Remove monetary impediment to upgrading. OETC pricing for Office is only around $40, but that sometimes stops people. We see this mainly in terms of being able to keep work groups homogenous. -Irv --On Thursday, February 1, 2001 9:30 AM -0800 Margaret Worley wrote: > Questions: > > Are you using it (MS Campus Agreement)? > > If so, what circumstances led you to use it? > > Have you received any software grants because of it? > > Does it save you any money, etc? In other words, how would we benefit > from it? > > Thanks in advance for responses > Margaret > -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > Margaret Worley, Director | voice: (253)535-8470 > Academic/User Support | email: worleyme@plu.edu > Computing and Telecommunication Services | fax: (253)536-5099 > Pacific Lutheran University > Tacoma, WA 98447 > > Help protect your privacy! Never put personal information (your own or > that of another person) in an e-mail message. From irvw at linfield.edu Mon Feb 5 10:09:26 2001 From: irvw at linfield.edu (Irv Wiswall) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: SCUP Satellite Telecast w/PBS on March 15 Message-ID: <494999.3190356566@[10.171.255.53]> Folks, SCUP is doing a teleconference on technology planning in higher ed for VP types on March 15. Linfield may want to participate, but we don't have downlink capability. (anyone missing the irony is in serious need of irony supplements) Anyone participating that wouldn't mind some guests and help paying subscription fees? -Irv From GSHEARER at seattleu.edu Mon Feb 5 11:14:25 2001 From: GSHEARER at seattleu.edu (Shearer, George) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: SCUP Satellite Telecast w/PBS on March 15 Message-ID: <2CB090FC30192549B04101547F33E93F01DC7403@exegrnnts005.seattleu.edu> Irv, Seattle University would be happy to help in some manner. We would need more details about cost but I am sure we could record the presentation and make it available for others to view. If it works best to commit to be a receive site, then we could check availability on one of our conference rooms. George Shearer Director-Instructional Support Information Technology Seattle University 900 Broadway Seattle WA 98122 206-296-5592 > ---------- > From: Irv Wiswall > Reply To: nw-heat@nw-heat.org > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2001 11:00 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: SCUP Satellite Telecast w/PBS on March 15 > > Folks, SCUP is doing a teleconference on technology planning in higher ed > > for VP types on March 15. Linfield may want to participate, but we don't > have downlink capability. (anyone missing the irony is in serious need of > irony supplements) Anyone participating that wouldn't mind some guests and > > help paying subscription fees? > > -Irv > > > From kelly at lclark.edu Tue Feb 6 09:01:21 2001 From: kelly at lclark.edu (kelly@lclark.edu) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: [Fwd: Job at Lewis & Clark College] Message-ID: <146757.3190438881@[149.175.21.181]> A job announcement that some of you might find interesting or know of somebody who might be interested. Kelly ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Date: Monday, February 5, 2001 3:22 PM -0800 From: Kari Chisholm To: Kelly Wainwright Subject: [Fwd: Job at Lewis & Clark College] Howdy all-- Below is a short job posting for a Web Communications Consultant here at Lewis & Clark College. Basically, I'm looking for that rare individual who can think, write, edit, strategize, code, schmooze, and have fun doing it. It's a tall order, but I'm sure the right talent is out there -- someone who wants to do fascinating projects and work at the most beautiful campus in America. -kari. Kari Chisholm, karic@lclark.edu Creative Director for New Media Lewis & Clark College Portland, Oregon USA http://www.lclark.edu ------------------------------ Job Opening: Web Communications Consultant Office of Publications Lewis & Clark College Plans and develops Web communication strategies for departmental clients that lead to effective communications to external audiences. Provides leadership, consultation, and Web development services to academic and administrative departments. Reports to the Creative Director for New Media. Salary is $28,000 - $32,000 / year. Starting date for this full-time, year-round position is immediately. Apply by February 23, 2001. See the complete job posting and application instructions here: http://www.lclark.edu/dept/hr/jobs_staff.html Please distribute this announcement. ---------- End Forwarded Message ---------- Kelly Wainwright Director of Client Services Information Technology Lewis & Clark College From prescott at up.edu Thu Feb 8 14:26:11 2001 From: prescott at up.edu (Jerilyn Prescott) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Copyright, CD Rom Burner and Radio Station Message-ID: <3A831D03.558EC96D@up.edu> The student run radio station at the University of Portland wants a CD-ROM Burner to condense their CD collection. They want to copy selected songs ('the good ones') then archive or throw away the original CD to clear space for new CDs. I have misgivings that is a violation of copyright law. However, I do not know for sure. Does anyone know the answer? Are other university radio stations doing this? Any comments are very much welcome! Thanks, Jerilyn Prescott Project and Service Manager Computer and Telecommunication Services University of Portland 5000 N Willamette Blvd. Portland OR 97203 503.943-7469 prescott@up.edu From mextine at stmartin.edu Fri Feb 9 09:58:53 2001 From: mextine at stmartin.edu (Extine, Michael W.) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: Copyright, CD Rom Burner and Radio Station Message-ID: Here's what our librarian said, " ... It would be funny if it weren't so frightening. I'd direct her to http://loc.gov/copyright. The DCMA has very clear implications here." -----Original Message----- From: Jerilyn Prescott [mailto:prescott@up.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Copyright, CD Rom Burner and Radio Station The student run radio station at the University of Portland wants a CD-ROM Burner to condense their CD collection. They want to copy selected songs ('the good ones') then archive or throw away the original CD to clear space for new CDs. I have misgivings that is a violation of copyright law. However, I do not know for sure. Does anyone know the answer? Are other university radio stations doing this? Any comments are very much welcome! Thanks, Jerilyn Prescott Project and Service Manager Computer and Telecommunication Services University of Portland 5000 N Willamette Blvd. Portland OR 97203 503.943-7469 prescott@up.edu From pitterk at whitman.edu Wed Feb 14 08:27:06 2001 From: pitterk at whitman.edu (Keiko Pitter) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:22 2006 Subject: training opportunities Message-ID: Hi folks I've been seeing several "new" people subscribe to the list recently, welcome! Just so you don't think that there is no activity on this list, I thought I would post "something"...but an important "something"---training opportunities. Most of us in nw-heat also belongs to an organization called NWACC--Northwest Academic Computing Consortium. One of the opportunity provided by NWACC is funding for workshops. If you have an idea for a great workshop (and if you want to coordinate it that's even better) that may be of benefit to folks in the northwest, can you submit a proposal? You can find the information on this at the NWACC Web page...http://www.nwacc.org/conferences/new_guidelines.htm Keiko Pitter Whitman College