From irvw at linfield.edu Thu Oct 10 16:21:00 2002 From: irvw at linfield.edu (Irv Wiswall) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:44 2004 Subject: question Message-ID: <3094996.1034266860@[10.219.200.21]> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 253 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.nw-heat.org/pipermail/nw-heat/attachments/20021010/b3d6eb92/attachment.bin From jcallaha at willamette.edu Thu Oct 10 17:36:13 2002 From: jcallaha at willamette.edu (John Callahan) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:44 2004 Subject: Packeteer References: <3094996.1034266860@[10.219.200.21]> Message-ID: <3DA61CFD.A9103D97@willamette.edu> Hi Nw-heaters -- Speaking of Packeteer but not related to training... Is anyone else seeing a marked increase in HTTP traffic this year? We now see a minimum of 3 Mb/s of just HTTP inbound... KaZaA and pals are squeezed down to fit into a 256k min partition but we still see slow service for web applications. We heard a rumor from a student that there is a KaZaA over HTTP proxy application going around. Has anyone out there researched this and trained the a PacketShaper to classify it? Cheers! John -- John P. Callahan Director, Network Services Willamette University 900 State St, Salem OR, 97301 Phone: 503-375-5495 Fax: 503-375-5456 From allendp at plu.edu Thu Oct 10 18:36:28 2002 From: allendp at plu.edu (David P. Allen) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:44 2004 Subject: Packeteer References: <3DA61CFD.A9103D97@willamette.edu> Message-ID: <3DA62B1C.8010600@plu.edu> John Callahan wrote: >Hi Nw-heaters -- > >Speaking of Packeteer but not related to training... > >Is anyone else seeing a marked increase in HTTP traffic this year? > >We now see a minimum of 3 Mb/s of just HTTP inbound... KaZaA and pals are >squeezed down to fit into a 256k min partition but we still see slow service for >web applications. > >We heard a rumor from a student that there is a KaZaA over HTTP proxy >application going around. Has anyone out there researched this and trained the >a PacketShaper to classify it? > >Cheers! >John >-- >John P. Callahan >Director, Network Services >Willamette University >900 State St, Salem OR, 97301 >Phone: 503-375-5495 Fax: 503-375-5456 > > Mr. Callahan- I have been following a thread on Stanford's PacketShaper list describing a problem many users of the latest firmware are seeing related to the problem you describe above. Basically, the new KaZaA (v2) does use some kind of new functionality that gets classified as HTTP. However, Packeteer is working with several of those schools to implement a fix that should be out with firmware 5.3.0 in the first week or two of November. If it is a big problem I'd recommend calling Packeteer support and you can probably talk them into allowing you to "test" the patch. Obviously I cannot gurantee that the HTTP traffic you are seeing is actually KaZaA, but I'd give it even money at the least. David P. Allen Network Manager Pacific Lutheran University From jdriskell at ups.edu Fri Oct 11 08:29:15 2002 From: jdriskell at ups.edu (James M. Driskell) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:44 2004 Subject: FW: Info On HTTP Tunnel Message-ID: <001201c2713a$f5834d60$2d627cc0@jdriskell> The attached article may shed some light on the high traffic loads seen on port 80. Jim Driskell -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Turnley [mailto:jeremyturnley@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:24 PM To: jdriskell@ups.edu Cc: jturnley@ups.edu Subject: Info This may be why HTTP traffic is so high.... http://http-tunnel.com/HT_Products_HTTPTunnelClient.asp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.nw-heat.org/pipermail/nw-heat/attachments/20021011/2aa91eb4/attachment.htm From allendp at plu.edu Tue Oct 15 11:41:22 2002 From: allendp at plu.edu (David P. Allen) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:44 2004 Subject: Packeteer References: <006601c2716d$40a0f720$2a010b0a@whitman.edu> Message-ID: <3DAC6152.2060702@plu.edu> A couple of folks have asked me about Stanford's PacketShaper listserv so here y'all go. To subscribe to the packeteer list: Send a message to: majordomo@lists.stanford.edu In the body put: subscribe packeteer-edu David P. Allen Network Manager Pacific Lutheran University Kevin Kelly wrote: >I am interested in the PacketShaper list at Stanford. How do I join >that list? > >Thanks > >Kevin Kelly >Director, Network and Technical Services >Whitman College > > From jcallaha at willamette.edu Wed Oct 16 13:26:40 2002 From: jcallaha at willamette.edu (John Callahan) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:34:44 2004 Subject: Hotmail Problems Message-ID: <3DADCB80.C49BAC67@willamette.edu> Hello NW Heaters - I thought I would pass on word of what I've just heard from a Hotmail rep (a live person!) in case anyone else is getting complaints from their users regarding Hotmail addresses... Over the past few days, we have seen many e-mail messages to "lists" bounce with a DSN message and a 5.0.0 status code for all of the Hotmail addresses. The body of the DSN message looks something like this: Original-Recipient: Final-Recipient: rfc822;(username)@hotmail.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 The gentleman I spoke to acknowledged that it is currently affecting all Hotmail servers and started about 48 hours ago. He suggested that we change our mail servers to deliver to one recipient at a time for hotmail addresses -- yikes! Hotmail expects to have the problem fixed within another 48 hours. John -- John P. Callahan Director, Network Services Willamette University 900 State St, Salem OR, 97301 Phone: 503-375-5495 Fax: 503-375-5456 From irvw at linfield.edu Thu Oct 10 16:21:00 2002 From: irvw at linfield.edu (Irv Wiswall) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:23 2006 Subject: question Message-ID: <3094996.1034266860@[10.219.200.21]> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 253 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.nw-heat.org/pipermail/nw-heat/attachments/20021010/b3d6eb92/attachment-0001.bin From jcallaha at willamette.edu Thu Oct 10 17:36:13 2002 From: jcallaha at willamette.edu (John Callahan) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:23 2006 Subject: Packeteer References: <3094996.1034266860@[10.219.200.21]> Message-ID: <3DA61CFD.A9103D97@willamette.edu> Hi Nw-heaters -- Speaking of Packeteer but not related to training... Is anyone else seeing a marked increase in HTTP traffic this year? We now see a minimum of 3 Mb/s of just HTTP inbound... KaZaA and pals are squeezed down to fit into a 256k min partition but we still see slow service for web applications. We heard a rumor from a student that there is a KaZaA over HTTP proxy application going around. Has anyone out there researched this and trained the a PacketShaper to classify it? Cheers! John -- John P. Callahan Director, Network Services Willamette University 900 State St, Salem OR, 97301 Phone: 503-375-5495 Fax: 503-375-5456 From allendp at plu.edu Thu Oct 10 18:36:28 2002 From: allendp at plu.edu (David P. Allen) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:23 2006 Subject: Packeteer References: <3DA61CFD.A9103D97@willamette.edu> Message-ID: <3DA62B1C.8010600@plu.edu> John Callahan wrote: >Hi Nw-heaters -- > >Speaking of Packeteer but not related to training... > >Is anyone else seeing a marked increase in HTTP traffic this year? > >We now see a minimum of 3 Mb/s of just HTTP inbound... KaZaA and pals are >squeezed down to fit into a 256k min partition but we still see slow service for >web applications. > >We heard a rumor from a student that there is a KaZaA over HTTP proxy >application going around. Has anyone out there researched this and trained the >a PacketShaper to classify it? > >Cheers! >John >-- >John P. Callahan >Director, Network Services >Willamette University >900 State St, Salem OR, 97301 >Phone: 503-375-5495 Fax: 503-375-5456 > > Mr. Callahan- I have been following a thread on Stanford's PacketShaper list describing a problem many users of the latest firmware are seeing related to the problem you describe above. Basically, the new KaZaA (v2) does use some kind of new functionality that gets classified as HTTP. However, Packeteer is working with several of those schools to implement a fix that should be out with firmware 5.3.0 in the first week or two of November. If it is a big problem I'd recommend calling Packeteer support and you can probably talk them into allowing you to "test" the patch. Obviously I cannot gurantee that the HTTP traffic you are seeing is actually KaZaA, but I'd give it even money at the least. David P. Allen Network Manager Pacific Lutheran University From jdriskell at ups.edu Fri Oct 11 08:29:15 2002 From: jdriskell at ups.edu (James M. Driskell) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:23 2006 Subject: FW: Info On HTTP Tunnel Message-ID: <001201c2713a$f5834d60$2d627cc0@jdriskell> The attached article may shed some light on the high traffic loads seen on port 80. Jim Driskell -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Turnley [mailto:jeremyturnley@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:24 PM To: jdriskell@ups.edu Cc: jturnley@ups.edu Subject: Info This may be why HTTP traffic is so high.... http://http-tunnel.com/HT_Products_HTTPTunnelClient.asp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.nw-heat.org/pipermail/nw-heat/attachments/20021011/2aa91eb4/attachment.html From allendp at plu.edu Tue Oct 15 11:41:22 2002 From: allendp at plu.edu (David P. Allen) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:23 2006 Subject: Packeteer References: <006601c2716d$40a0f720$2a010b0a@whitman.edu> Message-ID: <3DAC6152.2060702@plu.edu> A couple of folks have asked me about Stanford's PacketShaper listserv so here y'all go. To subscribe to the packeteer list: Send a message to: majordomo@lists.stanford.edu In the body put: subscribe packeteer-edu David P. Allen Network Manager Pacific Lutheran University Kevin Kelly wrote: >I am interested in the PacketShaper list at Stanford. How do I join >that list? > >Thanks > >Kevin Kelly >Director, Network and Technical Services >Whitman College > > From jcallaha at willamette.edu Wed Oct 16 13:26:40 2002 From: jcallaha at willamette.edu (John Callahan) Date: Thu Oct 5 10:00:23 2006 Subject: Hotmail Problems Message-ID: <3DADCB80.C49BAC67@willamette.edu> Hello NW Heaters - I thought I would pass on word of what I've just heard from a Hotmail rep (a live person!) in case anyone else is getting complaints from their users regarding Hotmail addresses... Over the past few days, we have seen many e-mail messages to "lists" bounce with a DSN message and a 5.0.0 status code for all of the Hotmail addresses. The body of the DSN message looks something like this: Original-Recipient: Final-Recipient: rfc822;(username)@hotmail.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 The gentleman I spoke to acknowledged that it is currently affecting all Hotmail servers and started about 48 hours ago. He suggested that we change our mail servers to deliver to one recipient at a time for hotmail addresses -- yikes! Hotmail expects to have the problem fixed within another 48 hours. John -- John P. Callahan Director, Network Services Willamette University 900 State St, Salem OR, 97301 Phone: 503-375-5495 Fax: 503-375-5456